Fire in a Canebrake Essays -- Literary Analysis, Laura Wexler

In her Fire in a Canebrake, Laura Wexler describes an important event in mid-twentieth century American race relations, coherent ago relegated to the clo make out of American consciousness. In so doing, Wexler not wholly skill practicedy describes the eventthe Moores Ford lynching of 1946but incorporates it into our instinct of the present world and past by retaining the complexities of doubt and deception that encircled the event when it occurred, and which still confound it in historical records. By skillfully navigating these currents of deceit, too, Wexler is not only able to portray them to the reader in full form, but also historicize this muddled record in the context of current larger historical truths. In this fashion, and by refusing to cede to a confide for closure by drawing easy but inherently flaw conclusions regarding the individuals directly responsible for the 1946 lynching, Wexler demonstrates that she is more interested in a larger historical picture than t he single event to which she dedicates her text. And, in so doing, she rebukes the doubts of those who doubt the importance of bringing up the lynching, lending powerful motivation and determination to her writing that sustains her narrative, and the audiences attention to it.This motivation and purpose argon most evident in the quality of Wexlers writing, made salient(ip) by her painstaking awareness throughout the text of, firstly, such fundamental frequency things as setting and the introduction of characters, and, secondly, the overarching threads of, for instance, national and state politics, which set the larger stage for the story. In her text, Wexler briefly mentions a prominent interpret in the NAACP, Walter White, noting his biting statements regarding the lynching a ... ...lusionsnot only in regards to who the lynchers were, but also in regards to the identities of the victims (230), and, worst of all, whether or not the issues rally to the Moores Ford lynching have been settled, and are past. In these senses, decision about these issues encourages falseness, precludes justice, and makes the audience let go of things that ought not to be let goand this, short of the lynching itself, is one of the greatest possible wrongs (244). It is by refusing to conclude, then, that Laura Wexler achieves the greatest success of her outstanding narrative, and is able to successfully navigates the lies and deception of a muddled historical event by adeptly presenting them in the context of larger historical truths. Work CitedWexler, Laura. 2003. Fire in a Canebrake The Last survey Lynching in America. Scribner 2004. Print