Eros, Thanatos and the Depiction of Women in “a Farewell to Arms” Essay

A c beer as wonderful as that of Ernest Hemingway can non simply be condensed into a handful of news programs. If unrivaledness were to reconstruct the attempt anyway, no choice seems to be more fitting than revere, wipe pop and wowork force. These topics are regular companions wipeout-to-end all of his work and indeed, his vitality. His 1929 masterpiece, A cong to arms, is a especially good example of this. In this paper, I will show how these recurring subjects the fascinating interplay between physical attraction and remnant neediness and the depiction of women help shape this seminal work.To fully appreciate the yarn told in the raw, and to better understand the aforementioned, seemingly inadequate three-word summary of Hemingways life, roughly key events in his biography should be make kn feature. Ernest Hemingway was innate(p) on July 21, 1899, in Oak Park, Illinois. In his high school years, he wrote for the school newspaper and would go on to work for the Kansas City champ these early journalistic experiences would influence his distinctive writing style. In 1918, he signed on to become an ambulance driver in fight-torn Italy.On July 8, he was severely injured by a mortar whip and received a medal for bravery. During his sixth-month recuperation, he fell in love with a Red Cross nurse after deciding to stick around married, she left him for an Italian officer. This traumatic experience would decisively shape his visit of women. (Wikipedia) Hemingway would endure further trials finishedout his life shortly after the particularly difficult delivery of his son in 1928, he received word of his fathers suicide, foreshadowing his eventual demise by his own hand on July 2, 1961.Until then, he suffered by means of severe alcoholism, multiple divorces, stultify accidents, bouts of depression and dangerous struggle coverage. (Wikipedia) Taking this eventful existence into consideration, the richness of both(prenominal) Eros and Thanatos and the noteworthy depiction of women in A part to ordnance come as no great storm it is the latter which I will first examine more closely. Hemingway and, by extension, his works, drop often been accused of misogyny A Farewell to Arms is no exception (Wexler 111). Catherine, the main female character, defines herself in terms of men (Fetterley 67).When her late fiancee goes to state of war, she joins him as a nurse because of the silly idea he might come to the hospital where she was , with a sabre attenuate or shot through the shoulder some issue visualizesque (Hemingway 19). Later on, her stereotypical wish to nurse her lover acantha to health even comes true when Frederic is situated in her care (Fetterley 67). She also shows a significant need for reassurance You are happy, arent you? Is there anything I do you dont wish well? Can I do anything to please you? (Hemingway 105).Her self-loathing and unhealthy self-image also reveals itself in this telling p assage How many girls admit you stayed with? Its all right. make unnecessary right on lying to me. Thats what I want you to do. When a man stays with a girl when does she say how much it be? I do anything you want. I want what you want. There isnt any me any more. (Hemingway 95-96) This section is a particularly damning example of misogyny in effect, Catherine is asking Frederic how to be a whore, demeaning both herself and her spotless sex in her quest to please her beloved at any cost (Fetterley 68).Catherine is far from the just now dupe of the sometimes debasing handling of women in the book. During the retreat, the girls from the soldiers whorehouse (Hemingway 168) are loaded into a truck one of the soldiers present remarks Id like to be there when some of those tough babies climb in and try and hop them. Id like to have a crack at them for nothing. They charge also much at that house anyway. The government gyps us. (Hemingway 168-169) This stunning insolence of f emale dignity makes apparent the utter disregard the soldiers have for women as human bes.A passage later on exemplifies this victimization and objectification of women during war even more clearly when the retreating convoy picks up 2 virgins, their fearful demeanor leaves no doubt there are tho(prenominal) two roles for them on the battlefield whores if they are picked up by their own side, victims of dishonour if they are captured by the enemy. (Fetterley 50) The contempt of the fair gender does not stop at the disparagement of women themselves the very thing that makes them female is attacked. When the decrepit leather boxes heavy with the packs of clips of thin, long 6.5 mm. cartridges are described as making the troops look as though they were six months asleep(p) with child (Hemingway 4), deadly implements of war are directly linked to pregnancy. This paints an unsettling mental picture of female biology itself as a source of death, not life, culminating in Catherin es passing in the final chapter (Fetterley 62-63). This depiction of women as subordinate to men, trying to fulfill their every need, is almost Puritanical in nature, hearkening back to the earliest, primary incarnations of the American myth.The fact that sexual gratification, not conception and accouchement which is indeed presented as a biological maw (Hemingway 125) and, eventually, a death sentence is extolled as the primary reason for a relationship shows, however, that Hemingways work is firmly in the subversive consummatory phase. Thankfully, the view of women presented in the novel is not wholly sexist. Catherine in particular manages to distinguish herself as a strong woman both in the dismountning and the end of the novel, patronage losing her identity to Frederic in the middle.Frederics courtship of Catherine initiations with a literally tart rejection when he first tries to kiss her, he is rewarded with a sharp ache flash of a slap (Hemingway 24). Thus, Catherin e asserts her dominance, taking control of their early relationship. after Frederic manages to make her laugh, however, she quickly accepts his advances. (Wexler 114) Frederics intentions towards Catherine are less than noble to begin with I knew I did not love Catherine Barkley nor had any idea of harming her.This was a game, like bridge, in which you said things instead of playing card game (Hemingway 29). Catherine, however, is not only aware of the deceptive nature of their faux-relationship, but actively addresses it This is a rotten game we play, isnt it? You dont have to pretend you love me. (Hemingway, 29-30) With the mutual acknowledgment of their pretense, Catherine is using Frederic just as much as he is using her where he seeks to escape the horrors of the war with carnal gratification, Catherine needs someone to fill the hole left by her late fiancee. (Wexler 114-115)Despite the loss of self and neediness experienced by Catherine throughout most of the middle of the novel, her strong, confident side manages to reassert itself before her wretched demise in childbirth. Even though she faces her imminent death, the only thing on her mind is reassuring her husband Dont worry, darling, Im not a bit afraid. Its just a dirty trick (Hemingway 292). This serenely selfless behavior is far remote from the desperate need to please she displayed earlier. As has foretastefully become apparent, both death and life (or love, both physical and romantic) play a authoritative role in A Farewell to Arms.In the side by side(p) section, I will waste a closer look at this compelling relationship between Eros and Thanatos. Since the novel takes place during the stalwartly brutal conflict that was World War I, Thanatos is always active. Eros always manages to weave its way into the proceedings, however, even gaining the upper hand at one point in the novel. In the beginning, however, Thanatos prevails (Flores 29). The reader is presented with uncompromising sc enes of violence and carnage, but the horrors of war are met with stoicism by the promoter Frederic Henry.The death of thousands barely qualifies for a single paragraph At the start of the winter came the permanent rain and with the rain came the cholera. further it was checked and in the end only seven thousand died of it in the army. (Hemingway 4) Frederic also seems to have no particular reason for even being in the war being in Italy seems to be enough (Flores 29). He is not set by any particular ideological reason, either Abstract linguistic process such as glory, honor, courage, or hallow were obscene beside the concrete label of villages, the numbers of roads, the names of rivers, the numbers of regiments and the dates.(Hemingway 165) Almost every character in the novel also engages in self-destructive behavior excessive drinking. seek oblivion instead of actually facing the horrors of war, alcohol is a constant companion to all throughout the book (Flores 31). Even w hen Eros touches the characters in the beginning, it is only in its basest forms. The flirtatious Rinaldi seems incapable of real love, seeking only sexual gratification (Ganzel 587). And, as mentioned above, even the relationship of Frederic and Catherine starts out as a lie, filling a need in both of them not with love, but lust.As the story unfolds, however, the grip of Thanatos on Frederic begins to weaken. pursuance his injury on the battlefield, his stoicism and aloofness are only slimly fazed (Ganzel 594). During his extended period of recuperation in the hospital, Frederic and Catherine start growing real feelings for each other learning about her pregnancy in particular shakes him to his core Her conception forces him into a continuum in which the death of another(prenominal) can subtract from his own life. (Ganzel 579)During the Italian retreat, Thanatos tries to reassert its get the picture on Frederic but after not only witnessing, but being directly responsible fo r a number of deaths in a agonizing experience, he finally slips its grasp (Ganzel 595). Having truly fallen for Catherine, his new loyalty to Eros is confirmed in his baptismal farewell to arms in the river. Frederic voices these new life-affirming thoughts after escaping the river I was not made to think. I was made to eat. My God, yes. Eat and drink and sleep with Catherine.(Hemingway 206) Thanatos reclaims his power at the end of the novel after the deceptively light-hearted stay in Switzerland in a cruel twist of spate, it is childbirth, the ultimate expression of Eros, that takes Catherines life, springing the biological trap and leaving Frederic to trudge out into the rain, forlorn (Ganzel 581). He poignantly laments his fate Poor, poor dear Cat. And this was the price you paid for sleeping together. This was the end of the trap. This was what heap got for loving each other. (Hemingway 283)Frederic is not the only one affected by an insidious turn of events like that, ho wever Rinaldi also becomes a victim of the biological trap, falling prey to syphilis (Hemingway 289). Thus, Thanatos is not only able to turn the lofty side of Eros romantic love against its followers, but even manages to turn its basest side into death. Thus, Frederic Henry is the first altogether developed example of what was to become Hemingways dominant motif a man who is forced to recognize the inevitability of death and the concomitant foiling of trying to secure something of value from its onslaught (Ganzel 577).The good soldier, protected from feelings of loss and fear by an uncaring stoicism, loses his gift through love, only to reach the tragic realization that his newfound feelings can be turn against him. (Ganzel 578) This portrayal of life and death, distinctive of the Lost Generation of modernist authors, stands in crude(prenominal) contrast to earlier, romantic and playful depictions. Where Whitman is able to confidently boast And as to you Death, and you bitt er hug of mortality, it is idle to try to alarm me (Song of Myself 1289), Hemingways view of death paints a much more sobering pictureIf people bring so much courage to this military personnel the world has to kill them to break them, so of course it kills them. The world breaks every one and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very reconcile and the very brave impartially. If you are none of these you can be surely it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry. (Hemingway 222) Even spring, once the ultimate symbol of hope and life flourishing anew, is turned into a mockery of itself.As Eliot competently puts it April is the cruelest month (The Waste Land 1), bringing only death and despondency to Frederic and Catherine. Winter, on the other hand, once the harbinger of struggles and hardship for the first pilgrims that reached the shores of America, is shown as peaceful, quiet, serene I t was a fine country and every time that we went out it was fun. (Hemingway 269) The future, once viewed with optimism, a Manifest Destiny to look forward to, all of a sudden looked much bleaker, an outlook colored by a war that defied belief. pity and courage were nowhere to be found, but cruelty abounded, as illustrated in this passage If there is a retreat, how are the wounded evacuated? They are not. They take as many as they can and leave the rest. (Hemingway 167) In conclusion, I hope that the importance of the changing influence of Eros and Thanatos and the refutable portrayal of women in A Farewell to Arms has become obvious. These topics step up in all of Hemingways works, with varying importance. Much of the novel becomes clearer when viewed through the lens of Hemingways biography.Taking into consideration some of the key points of his life I mentioned in the introduction, the autobiographical tendencies of the book should emerge perhaps assist to make his overt ma chismo understandable, if not palatable. Most importantly, A Farewell to Arms does an excellent job of showing the reader the sheer insanity and, through the authors unique style, the stark reality of war. Hemingway himself put it quite succinctly Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime.Bibliography * Eliot, T. S. The Waste Land. Project Gutenberg. http//www. gutenberg. org/files/1321/1321-h/1321-h. htm (Last accessed 13. 08. 2013) * Fetterley Judith. The resisting reader A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1978. * Flores, Olga Eugenia. Eros, Thanatos and the Hemingway Soldier. American Studies International, Vol. 18, No. 3/4 (Spring/summertime 1980), pp. 27-35. * Ganzel, Dewey. A Farewell to Arms The Danger of Imagination.The Sewanee Review, Vol. 79, No. 4 (Autumn 1971), pp. 576-597. * Hemingway, Ernest. A Farewell to Arms. London, Arrow Books, 2004. * Wexler, Joyce. E. R. A. for Hemingway A Femin ist Defense of A Farewell to Arms. The Georgia Review, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Spring 1981), pp. 111-123. * Whitman, Walt. Song of Myself. University of Toronto RPO. http//rpo. library. utoronto. ca/poems/song-myself (Last accessed 13. 08. 2013) * http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Ernest_Hemingway (Last accessed 13. 08. 2013)