Machiavelli the Prince Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Machiavelli the Prince - Essay Example The people’s favor plays a chief responsibility in ensuring that princes remain in control of the realm. The kingdom, therefore, offers a lot of challenges to princes in order to stay in power since lack of community hold up leads to kingdom loss to preferred princes (Machiavelli 43). In regard to this problem, Machiavellian has proposed various ways in which princes and leaders in general should adopt to linger in power. The methods presented by the author are served to keep citizen support at all times both for the earlier leaders and leaders of today and tomorrow. However, despite the teaching of these methods in education institutions, most of the methods only apply for the case of the prince. The methods are specifically designed as tools for the prince’s selfish welfare. In the book, the author presents the question, and responses have been developed to criticize the thinker’s position, through various accounts presented by comparing it to the dangerous app roach of elitism. Presented Question The question presented by the thinker does not gyrate about what makes human good but rather what makes a compelling prince. The question has been perfectly answered by the writer through the application of the thinker ideologies. The ideologies are the methods that the thinker presents to the prince in an attempt to ensure the public remain on his side. The prince through the thinker must come up with stratagem to ensure loyalty from the masses, to keep the large population on his side. The issue brought about is that the prince has no regard for the human morality rather he cares more about retention of his realm. Critical Response The ideologies presented by Machiavelli can be regarded to be purely scientific. Machiavelli utilizes the classification system in which he treats kingdoms as the different species that have been prearranged into a political nomenclature. Machiavelli also provides suitable historical examples to back up his claims. H e exhibits his clear knowledge of past chronological events and develops the whole story through a clear argument. The prince has to uphold influence in his kingdom, and this necessitates the installation of fear into the citizens through various strict rules. However, while still maintaining power, the head has to take into thought the implications of the strict measures. The price has to install fear into the populace while still preventing an unnecessary cruelty since unnecessary cruelty may work against him. The prince has, therefore, to balance between cruelty and installation of fear as well as show respect to his subjects to prevent any unnecessary rivalries. The matter presented through the analysis, brings into light the idea that Machiavelli observes modest value in love, as well as the loyalty, that it might acquire from the populace. Machiavelli has the feeling that rulers have the obligation of making their citizens aware of their authority or powers (Machiavelli 38). T he author provides that competent princes have to establish themselves in their individual control of their realm instead of concentrating on other leaders. The author adds that the princes have to attempt to steer clear of hatred through any means possible. According to these statements, the author conveys the message that the rulers have to stay compact although they ought not to invite hatred because